AT module and RN2483: not working with my Linux box

Posted on
Page
of 3
First Prev
/ 3
  • Maybe link to espruino.com/RN2483 as well? Might be handy for buyers to have example code available :)

    @DrAzzy Feel free to add a link to your new board to there - it'd be really handy to have a link to something 'ready to go'. Also, just IMO, but you could offer an aerial as well. They're pretty cheap, but I had to order mine from China which took ages. I'd definitely have bought an 'all in one' if it were available...

  • Great, thanks. I'll order some aerials to offer as addons. Do you have experience with any specific ones that you thought were good?

  • Honestly, I have no idea. I bought this one, and it seems to work (but I haven't done any distance tests): ebay.co.uk/itm/291844009518

    You can get them a bit cheaper though.

  • @DrAzzy from my own experience, for such a device it will be far better to use a dipole antenna. The one pointed by Gordon should be a good candidate.

  • Cool, thanks. Ordered a few.

  • Does anyone have any links to sensible code for a really basic (non-TTN) LoRaWAN setup? I'm trying to get something really simple set up that I would have thought would be easy:

    • RN2483 with an Espruino
    • ic880a concentrator & Pi
    • Sending and receiving packets of data from node.js

    After much fighting I now have packet_forwarder running and forwarding packets over UDP, which I can decode in node.js. However it looks like sending data the other way is going to be just as painful, if not more so.

    @Jean-Philippe_Rey any ideas? It seemed like you'd done quite a bit of LoRa stuff

  • github.com/lrnzzz/RN2483-LoRa-Sh­ield is the shield
    Some guy sold me a nRF52 device that is neat.
    Trying to find some spring loaded connectors or else risk having to buy more devices from a guy if I make mistake with soldering.
    Code ?

    • hmm, Espruino was my best bet.

    thethingsnetwork.org/communi­ty/silkeborg/

    @gnz is zurich the things network

    github is a great place to post WIP ...

    github.com/lrnzzz/RN2483-LoRa-Sh­ield/issues/2 is a request for a puck.js footprint

    • in the meantime, I drill in the two boards I have and cross my fingers with the construction process

    By the way, things go slow at times cos the kids are building ...

    Edit: Probably wrong thread

  • Did you post in the wrong thread? I know you posted a bunch of stuff in other RN2483 threads, but I'm not convinced this really has much to do with the question of setting up a non-TTN LoraWan network

  • Hey @Gordon, in general, TTN shouldn't differ much (at all?) from any other LoRaWAN network. I haven't tested myself, but there are a bunch of guys in our local community that have sensors that they interchangeably switch from network to network without issues.

    If you wanna setup a local test environment to isolate from TTN and any other provider, I'd recommend this backend: github.com/brocaar/loraserver It's well documented and I know others have tried it successfully. About the concentrator, I guess you have it figured it by now, but you could use TTN install scripts (github.com/ttn-zh/ic880a-gateway­/wiki) and just change the backend server to forward to on the local_conf.json

    The biggest problems you will face with downlink (from backend to espruino) are related to time sync, the receive window is rather small, and it's a source of constant issues on some MCUs.

    Let me know if I can give you a hand.

    Cheers
    Gonzalo

    EDIT: Actually, I DID test switching networks now that I remember, and it worked without having to make changes to my node. Just provision the keys on the new network and off you go.

  • Thanks! I'll have a go at setting that up - I'd had a quick go, but it seemed a bit heavyweight with the MQTT transformation in there too.

    So far I'd just implemented the packet forwarder protocol in node.js, so I can receive fine - and I can even transmit as of yesterday (but just not it a way that can be received yet - I think I need to get the correct transmission format).

    For what I'm doing the LoRa nodes are well powered, so I can increase the receive window if needed. I guess the best thing is to make sure I can get something working with lora-server before I go off trying to do my own thing :)

  • before I go off trying to do my own thing

    yep, I'd advice against building it yourself unless you have a lot of extra time in your hands. Not sure what's your project exactly, but unless your goal is really to build a packet forwarder in node.js, then go with lora-server (or TTN, or a loriot.io community account) as your backend.

    Unless -of course- you're trying to build an espruino-powered lorawan gateway :)

  • wonders how far Gordon is with his thing as I just received 3 ic880a (spi) as well as having a couple of RN2483 boards that go in action in a bit.

  • 3 ic880a? Wow, that's expensive!

    I haven't had time to work on it sadly, but I'll have to get back to it soon. As @gnz suggested it looks like I'll have to go with lora-server.

    I'm working on smart electricity meters for a solar electricity system in developing countries, and there isn't a reliable internet connection so I need to make sure I can do everything I need to locally.

  • Yep: expensive, I got sponsered: they will be used for play and learn in education while the county council tried to find a sponsor for 5 that cover the town. In the meantime, they get setup and get used by kids if I can find the best solution for nodes with play and learn and fresh air measurements.
    The lack of internet connections (and power) is actually a small subset of the problems I have ( a luxury problem in europe) in order to allow for quick diagnose of a down gw.

    The play and learn pi GW will probably have a nodered.org/ server as I might as well put some of the pi to use with that (or any other crazy idea I get).

    Edit
    Actually, the lack of a stable internet is sometimes a problem in some places in europe for play and learn

    EDIT
    There are many thoughts about GW and lack of Internet backhaul that I want to address in my solution that may have interest:: new thread??? @Gordon

  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

AT module and RN2483: not working with my Linux box

Posted by Avatar for GeekBot @GeekBot

Actions