You are reading a single comment by @HughB and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
what are your thoughts on the format?
I prefer 1:23 or 1:45:15 rather than 1m23s and 1h45m15s, I think its easier to read and : take up less pace than h, m or s. On the LCD watch space is at a premium for one of the quarter segments, if the string wont fit the font has to be halved in size, so that quite significant.
HughB
bobrippling
Yeah I'd been thinking the second duration was a bit short. Thanks for checking it out! I like having the milliseconds and it makes the code more worth having if we keep it up to 1 minute, I'll go with that for now - will test out the 100m sprint next when I'm next at the track!
Speaking of settings, I'd quite like to drop the settings entirely - what are your thoughts on the format?