Search results for:

This is Onyx Boox Note Air 2 Plus
Features: E-ink, Android 11, perfect backlight, magnetic stylus included, etc.
Would I buy this again now? Yes! Great tool 👍

https://youtu.be/St5bZDCWRpE?si=tUdnQ-TcrtYq-dow

Nice review of this device 👆

E-ink is cool!

By the way, you can use the green light from HRM sensor as a flashlight in bjs2.
Just run HRM and shine it in a dark place, visibility will be much higher than from the screen as a flashlight ⚡

Behold! :)

About strap:
https://forum.espruino.com/conversations/378429/#comment16785752:~:text=Patreon-,I%20like%20my%20own%20strap,-%3A%20comfortable%2C%20practical%2C%20cheap

nice! 👍

Yep, I'm in =)

Yes, the Rpi has built-in bluetooth and everything works out of the box (after installing Raspberry Pi OS)

I have a Raspberry Pi 4 Model B and it works well with Bangle.js 2 and Bangle.js 1 via bluetooth

Hi! To be honest, I also have a big problems with this lately. As far as I understand, time drift appears due to the fact that I often use timers and stopwatches running in the background for a long time. I tried to fix the problem using the Adjust Clock app, but it's still an approximate solution and the time goes astray.

It would be great to have accurate RTC on a consistent basis.

Behold!

https://github.com/raspberrypi/pico-sdk/releases/tag/1.5.0

Bluetooth Support for Pico W (BETA)

Key changes:
The following new libraries are provided that expose core:

BTstack functionality: pico_btstack_ble - Adds Bluetooth Low Energy
(LE) support. pico_btstack_classic - Adds Bluetooth Classic support.
pico_btstack_sbc_encoder - Adds Bluetooth Sub Band Coding (SBC)
encoder support. pico_btstack_sbc_decoder - Adds Bluetooth Sub Band
Coding (SBC) decoder support. pico_btstack_bnep_lwip - Adds Bluetooth
Network Encapsulation Protocol (BNEP) support using LwIP.

and more!

I hope there will be some kind of video report? :)

Hi!

The funny thing is that I have the opposite experience of using Bangle.js: for me, the user experience is constantly changing for the better, which is surprising, given the limited budget of the project and the number of active developers. Bangle watch is getting better than what it was originally. And here is also a big merit of the community!
I did not have Pebble watch, although I closely followed their fate and regretted when the project was closed. Yes, I know about Rebble and I'm even subscribed to a Discord server (which also has a channel about Bangle.js). Obviously, Bangle.js has disadvantages, but there are also advantages over Pebble (for example, open source code from the very beginning).

I will go over the list of claims, although I will note that I am an enthusiast and am ready to put up with some problems, since there are much more advantages for me and I see a clear evolution of the project.

1) Battery life. Without GPS, my B.js 2 watch lives an average of 5-6 days, sometimes less, and this is under load, I like to run timers and stopwatches.
My friend's B.js 2 even lived for about a month, but this is without loads.
By the way, my first Bangle.js model lived about 3 months from a single charge, but the screen was constantly turned off, and I only occasionally checked the charge level.
2) I would like standardized Qi wireless charging in the next model. The wiring is inconvenient, yes.
3) It happened that I lost the data I needed and carefully configured options several times, but serious problems were really rare + then backups appeared.
4) Corrosion is a big drawback and a clear problem, I hope the future samples of Bangle.js 3 will be more carefully checked for such nuances. At this stage, I just resigned myself and took measures to avoid this, and so far there are no problems:
https://forum.espruino.com/conversations/370766/?offset=50#comment16793279:~:text=My%20way%3A%20I%20took%202%20adhesive
5) I knew that the button might have problems, so I decided to use the button to a minimum and it turns out great, after installing additional apps for gestures and some settings:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/199bUfpo4n7YU2YesK6AAHzuo1yLB6Ly1/view?usp=sharing

In general, in the first Bangle.js, the buttons were sometimes useful, but you can live without them perfectly.
6) There are some nuances with downloading apps, for example, the experience is better on Linux and Android, unlike iOS and Windows. But in general, I really like that the apps are tied to GitHub and available for download from the browser, via bluetooth, some new amazing experience. My complaint: for iOS there is no gadgetbridge Bangle version, so there is superiority towards one platform - Android.
However, this moment can theoretically scare off non-technical users, it is necessary to somehow improve stability and add support for iOS.
7) I have no complaints about the strength of the vibration, rather I would like a different TYPE of vibration, like the Taptic Engine, instead of the current one. So that there is no characteristic rattling of the motor, although this is not critical. I don’t know about calls, but I never missed notifications, moreover, I even sometimes turned off bluetooth, because notifications even went through sleep mode on the phone! The duration of the vibro can be adjusted for messages, I set it to the minimum short, it's enough for me. In general, if you put B.js 2 on itself edge on the table, the signal will be super loud, I try to avoid this.
8) It’s the other way around for me: now I constantly wear a watch, at bike rides, on vacation, at work, because they are almost weightless, so you can wear them for a long time without taking them off, keeping track of time and notifications. That is, in addition to smart functions, it is also just a convenient watch.
9) Yes, I would like more interesting integrations, for example, route recording and simple synchronization with Strava. A more perfect experience with maps. Theoretically, everything is possible in the future.
For a very long time, I recorded routes via GPS and manually exported routes for Strava, but this is tedious.

I also want to note that I like the technologies on which all this is implemented and the idea itself: JS on microcontrollers. This is an interesting technical challenge with such limitations. Also a great community and the opportunity to participate in a really important and necessary project. This applies to Espruino in general.

Well, count me in!

Hello! Welcome!
I also love Pebble watches, although I never had one, but I constantly followed their fate, I liked the concept.
Now I have the first and second version of Bangle.js watch and it's great!

There are really a lot of smart and passionate people in the Espruino community, I'm glad that I'm part of this community :)

Also I have seen many times how people are helped here with any questions arround Bangle.js :)

I think yes, thanks 👍

Is it possible to combine rotation with pattern through this application? https://banglejs.com/apps/?id=ptlaunch
So that any swipe can be assigned to a rotation?

Aha, here's the point 🤔 :) Unfortunately, I can't use this feature because I have iOS.

In theory, is it possible to convert messages as images at the watch level?

Looked for settings but couldn't find it. Can you please tell me where these options are in more detail?

I'm interested! I don’t know how soon I will get to this, but I have always been interested in organizing a Smart Home based on bluetooth, with a minimum of wires.

I would love to read about the results and experiments: how to deploy it, how stable will it work?

App?:
Pic messages
Make it that any (some) messages come in the form of pictures, not text.

Example:
SMS in Japanese should gradually appear as pictures on the B.js watch screen.

Why i need to 90° convenient rotation:

By the way, the 3D printer is budget, and the nozzle is large:

3d printer: Ender 3 V2
Nozzle diameter: 0.4 mm

My pal craft a DIY strap. Check it out!

A metal pins from a default strap that broke.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/s0jrzg02jxaz2cm/springbar_holder.zip?dl=0
Link to archive with 3d model of the pin holder;

Basic 3d model print options:

3d printer: Ender 3 V2
Nozzle diameter: 0.4 mm
Material - PLA;
Layer height - 0.12 mm;
Bottom layers - 99999;
Top/Bottom pattern - Concentric;
Print speed - 20 mm/s;
Support-Normal;
Overhang angle - 75 deg.;
Build plate adhesion - Skirt;

To get the best quality orient model vertically.

Checkered green canvas have half an inch by square.

Well, these are just thoughts, suddenly there will be a wider choice among donors for the next B.js watch :)

Also patches themselves would need maintaining if an app changed as they may then not apply cleanly. Not to mention how painful they would be to debug or change.

There's more to think about, but the simplest solution is to explicitly include the word "Patch" in the JSON of the application if it's a fork with minimal edits.

There will be an agreement: if your new application is an almost complete clone with minimal edits, then you must definitely specify the word "Patch" in the JSON. Further, such forked new applications will be placed in the "Patches" tab, where there can be any number of identical applications with minimal edits. How about this?

Ideally, there will be automation: a new app is being checked for a code match, if the code base matches by 80% (suppose), then the new app is automatically assigned the word "Patch" in its JSON, also can add a small ID in the form of a hash to the name. And all this is automatic.

Further, the author of the main origin app could use such patches for their origin app or ignore thats "patches" :)

In general, it would be nice to have a separate section in the App store with 'Patches'. Where would be a small additions to existing applications or duplicate applications with some changes.

It's would be like that: BT status widgets - patch 0.1
or that: BT status widgets - color patch
next: BT status widgets - awesome patch