Anyone else? I don't think anything has changed in the code, and looking at the image with Chrome devtools shows there's nothing odd there - it's just an img tag with a size of 4em. I guess Chrome could have changed its scaling algorithm but it seems unlikely.
If the image size were set in pixels to a multiple of 176px (like 88px) then the rendering would be a bit better for most screenshots, but then it wouldn't scale nicely on different devices like phones.
Espruino is a JavaScript interpreter for low-power Microcontrollers. This site is both a support community for Espruino and a place to share what you are working on.
Anyone else? I don't think anything has changed in the code, and looking at the image with Chrome devtools shows there's nothing odd there - it's just an
img
tag with a size of 4em. I guess Chrome could have changed its scaling algorithm but it seems unlikely.If the image size were set in pixels to a multiple of 176px (like 88px) then the rendering would be a bit better for most screenshots, but then it wouldn't scale nicely on different devices like phones.