Hi - when did you get your Puck 2.0? I know the first batch of 2.0s did have this issue and we ended up testing and reworking many of them.
... but obviously if we test and the battery holder doesn't come loose, we don't know if it'll let go 1 year later or not.
and this should be addressed for new batches I believe
I think the Puck.js 2.1 which we've had on sale for a while (almost a year?) are fixed - the manufacturer changed the profiles on the oven which meant the solder melted better.
The change to surface mount was really because we needed to space to put the extra sensors on - but as you note the PCB itself is solid enough to handle it - in this case it was just a manufacturing fault with how the solder was applied
Espruino is a JavaScript interpreter for low-power Microcontrollers. This site is both a support community for Espruino and a place to share what you are working on.
Hi - when did you get your Puck 2.0? I know the first batch of 2.0s did have this issue and we ended up testing and reworking many of them.
... but obviously if we test and the battery holder doesn't come loose, we don't know if it'll let go 1 year later or not.
I think the Puck.js 2.1 which we've had on sale for a while (almost a year?) are fixed - the manufacturer changed the profiles on the oven which meant the solder melted better.
The change to surface mount was really because we needed to space to put the extra sensors on - but as you note the PCB itself is solid enough to handle it - in this case it was just a manufacturing fault with how the solder was applied