Better Pedometer - HELP NEEDED!

I seem to recall that earlier you felt you had a lot of success with just the active
pedometer on earlier firmwares?

I think you are referring to comment #37 a couple of months back on Firmware 2v09.9 which I think had the filter. The test was only a single walk - which I have now established repeatedly will come out quite accurely. You then added the X steps in Y implementation a while later which is what I have tested. Its when the bangle is at rest (when sleeping or sittting / typing) that the false counting happens. But I probably should retest one of the v208 firmwares with the X steps in Y idea.

Do you have the C implementation I can look at for the pre-filter step counter ? I grabbed the git repo for Espruino but lib/misc/stepcount.c only goes as far back as April 2021. It must have been somewhere else before that ?

earliest commit I can find on stepcount.c is:

commit d338bfbf8a045362fcf07bbbc52996b457a94d8a­
Author: Gordon Williams <gw@pur3.co.uk>
Date:   Thu Apr 29 11:00:05 2021 +0100