You are reading a single comment by @Gordon and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
I believe StorageFile now allocates at least 40kB for each file on Bangle.js - so it probably isn't that efficient for you!
Oh wow that's pretty crazy. By using normal 'Storage' files we could probably reduce the production of un-erased flash pages by 40-fold, so compaction happens 40 times less frequently. Thanks!
user128983
@Gordon
No, it'd actually be doing the same thing StorageFile does - afaik repeated writes to a page are not a big issue, it's just the amount of times you can erase the page that causes flash wear.
I believe StorageFile now allocates at least 40kB for each file on Bangle.js - so it probably isn't that efficient for you!