You are reading a single comment by @fanoush and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
is it correct that we would have to switch SDK to a newer version to support bigger MTU sizes? I feel like Espruino still runs on SDK 12.
SoftDevice 3.0 used with SDK12 should support larger MTUs
https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/nordic/nordic-blog/b/blog/posts/s132-v30-production-version-now-available-from-nor
fanoush-
I'll give it another spin. Maybe I also made a mistake in the implementation. Whenever I set a bigger MTU size of 23 the SDK returned me an error 7 which is INVALID_PARAM. In the docs they say it's due to the fact that the maximum MTU size is smaller than the requested one, but I did update all the maximum MTU size definitions.
binux
iOS will automatically set MTU to 185 bytes. I think max. 200 bytes is a good size. This would be very handy if we are using the HTTP Proxy example.
Apart from that, is it correct that we would have to switch SDK to a newer version to support bigger MTU sizes? I feel like Espruino still runs on SDK 12.