CODE AND STORAGE OVERLAP while building firmware for NRF52

You are reading a single comment by @binux and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.

•

fanoush in reply to @binux

is it correct that we would have to switch SDK to a newer version to support bigger MTU sizes? I feel like Espruino still runs on SDK 12.

SoftDevice 3.0 used with SDK12 should support larger MTUs
https://devzone.nordicsemi.com/nordic/nordic-blog/b/blog/posts/s132-v30-production-version-now-available-from-nor

•

binux in reply to @fanoush

I'll give it another spin. Maybe I also made a mistake in the implementation. Whenever I set a bigger MTU size of 23 the SDK returned me an error 7 which is INVALID_PARAM. In the docs they say it's due to the fact that the maximum MTU size is smaller than the requested one, but I did update all the maximum MTU size definitions.

About

Avatar for binux @binux started