neoniousTR
Member since Jun 2019 • Last active Aug 2019- 0 conversations
- 4 comments
Most recent activity
-
-
Well, we might have changed it, but I do not remember when. A while ago most probably.
I understand you can compile JavaScript code to C. But it is not valid JavaScript anymore, it is a subset of JavaScript. But a cool feature non-the-less...It lets you do things with very small devices if you are willing to do it "the Espruino way".
low.js uses DukTape, but we've added a small JIT layer (does not optimize that much, however). And we try to become 100% Node.JS. We hope to get some people in the industry use it for industrial automation and things like that. A few customers we already have here.
All in all, I agree on your comparison.
-
Hello everyone, hello Gordon,
I'm Thomas from neonious. Just noticed this thread (Google).Regarding your post: you are incorrect with that the async functions of low.js will block somewhere. low.js provides 100% async read/writes. The async calls go into a different thread, which does not block the code thread. The neonious one even utilizes an additional SPI flash chip for the file system, so there is no call to esp_partition_read/write or whatever which would block.
Regarding speed of byte code vs source code, the following code runs multiple minutes with Espruino, while it only runs for 5 secs on low.js:
var k = 0; for(var i = 0; i < 1000; i++) for(var j = 0; j < 1000; j++) k += j; console.log('Done', k);
Over all, we're trying to be 100% truthful, so if you see anything wrong in our comparison on our website, please tell me exactly what we shall change.
Thank you,
Thomas
Nope, we have nothing to do with estimote.