There's no reason why it wouldn't work... I'll maybe see if I can get a batch of the new revision made with the G-spec chip (96kB RAM).
Just to add that it's possible that Espruino could be modified so that the same binary auto-detected the chip (within the F103 family) and used the correct amount of memory. That way different recompiles wouldn't be needed.
Having said all that, I have some plans that would really increase memory efficiency on existing chips. Making simple arrays 2x more efficient, and hopefully pushing the variable count up to 2250 from 1800 as well. I wonder if that's a better use of my time right now.
Espruino is a JavaScript interpreter for low-power Microcontrollers. This site is both a support community for Espruino and a place to share what you are working on.
There's no reason why it wouldn't work... I'll maybe see if I can get a batch of the new revision made with the G-spec chip (96kB RAM).
Just to add that it's possible that Espruino could be modified so that the same binary auto-detected the chip (within the F103 family) and used the correct amount of memory. That way different recompiles wouldn't be needed.
Having said all that, I have some plans that would really increase memory efficiency on existing chips. Making simple arrays 2x more efficient, and hopefully pushing the variable count up to 2250 from 1800 as well. I wonder if that's a better use of my time right now.