...The benefits of saving ~0.5 sec changing apps would be easily wiped out...
Yes, from my own tests not entirely managing to mitigate buildup in RAM use I absolutely see your point. But I am eager to have my bangle be faster with app switching in particular 😛 that's really the one area where it feels slow - within apps it's plenty responsive for my tastes.
What do you think of the route taken with the latest update to Icon Launcher where there's now the option to switch "fast app loading/switching" on in settings? Is it safeguard enough to have the default be regular load()-calls with the option of faster/likely less stable eval()-calls also for more apps? Or do you feel this could be more trouble than benefit as well? 🙂
Espruino is a JavaScript interpreter for low-power Microcontrollers. This site is both a support community for Espruino and a place to share what you are working on.
Yes, from my own tests not entirely managing to mitigate buildup in RAM use I absolutely see your point. But I am eager to have my bangle be faster with app switching in particular 😛 that's really the one area where it feels slow - within apps it's plenty responsive for my tastes.
What do you think of the route taken with the latest update to Icon Launcher where there's now the option to switch "fast app loading/switching" on in settings? Is it safeguard enough to have the default be regular load()-calls with the option of faster/likely less stable eval()-calls also for more apps? Or do you feel this could be more trouble than benefit as well? 🙂