It seems enabling the DC/DC regulator doesn't improve (always?) performances: check my post on GitHub where I compare different settings on a nRF51 board programmed to be a beacon in C. Enabling the low-frequency crystal does improve power consumption thought.
I am planning to do the same comparison with my FEASYCOM FSC-BT630 (nRF52) as soon as I get it. Additionally I would like to compare the beacon when programmed using Espruino (see this post for the original code). But from my current tries with my Holyiot YJ-17095 board, it seems the Espruino version consumes about 45uA so about 5 to 6 times more than the beacon version in C.
required restarting the BLE stack with different settings (disabling the communication with the IDE, etc) that would make this code running very similar to the code directly generated from C.
Espruino is a JavaScript interpreter for low-power Microcontrollers. This site is both a support community for Espruino and a place to share what you are working on.
It seems enabling the DC/DC regulator doesn't improve (always?) performances: check my post on GitHub where I compare different settings on a nRF51 board programmed to be a beacon in C. Enabling the low-frequency crystal does improve power consumption thought.
I am planning to do the same comparison with my FEASYCOM FSC-BT630 (nRF52) as soon as I get it. Additionally I would like to compare the beacon when programmed using Espruino (see this post for the original code). But from my current tries with my Holyiot YJ-17095 board, it seems the Espruino version consumes about 45uA so about 5 to 6 times more than the beacon version in C.
I can't explain this as I thought
required restarting the BLE stack with different settings (disabling the communication with the IDE, etc) that would make this code running very similar to the code directly generated from C.