Thank you @MaBe for responding. That code snippet would be what I would use with hardware SPI, if I could locate a suitable pin.
Should I accept the build link (from #2) Line38 and Line60 as fact, then using the corresponding Pixl .py file Line35 and Line67 mirrors the same, so both devices %should% have one hardware SPI, . . . Correct?
Espruino is a JavaScript interpreter for low-power Microcontrollers. This site is both a support community for Espruino and a place to share what you are working on.
Sat 2019.01.12
Thank you @MaBe for responding. That code snippet would be what I would use with hardware SPI, if I could locate a suitable pin.
Should I accept the build link (from #2) Line38 and Line60 as fact, then using the corresponding Pixl .py file Line35 and Line67 mirrors the same, so both devices %should% have one hardware SPI, . . . Correct?
However, when I check the reference pages, and roll-over the pin icons, I'm not seeing that hardware SPI at any pin.
Software SPI
From @allObjects article link in #1 above and
the format is more like this, isn't it?
The other perplexing issue is whether software SPI is fast enough for Neopixels on these two devices.