Well I am all for more data (while its not a huge drain on the battery or user configurable).
In this case were the data is captured anyway (i think if it sums up all intermittent values?) it probably increases accuracy significantly.
I mean sleep tracking was one of the main reasons I got a smartwatch for in the first place:)
Now what can be done about identifying sleep or not probably depends on how common a tight boundary really is. If most people have a clearer cut off between the two states then I am an outlier and could be treated as such. If its common then at least the initial values should be adjusted and the potential range tightened (or better documented)
We need more data;)
© Espruino, powered by microcosm.
Report a problem