You are reading a single comment by @Gordon and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • The first option for dynamic sizing sounds good. It seems like that's a good option (allowing the softdevice to change as required).

    However there's quite a bit of work to do to make this usable - for instance the RAM needed actually has to be computed, and the options have to be saved somewhere. I guess dedicating some area of flash memory to it would be a good idea.

    I feel like just having separate firmware images would be far easier though. And it's something I need to do more anyway, and for instance many people would prefer not to have a networking capability inside Puck.js but to instead have a bunch of extra storage space.


Avatar for Gordon @Gordon started