Discontinous pin numbers (for nRF52840 dongle) #7338
Unanswered
espruino-discuss
asked this question in
Other Boards
Replies: 1 comment
-
Posted at 2019-09-23 by @gfwilliams There's actually a special definition for it called Basically if all the pins are there then Espruino just works out the offset in pinInfo based on the number after IMO it wouldn't be the end of the world to leave all the pins defined though? edit: I just saw your other post - seems like a good plan to remove them :) Posted at 2019-09-24 by AkosLukacs Thanks, I will check it out! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Posted at 2019-09-21 by AkosLukacs
Hi!
Trying to make a correct board definition for the nRF52840 dongle, it's working, but got hung up at the pin definitions: A couple of pins are not connected on the dongle. For example P0.03 is not connected.
Tried two things in the board definition:
1: create all the pins, and remove the not connected ones:
2: start with empty pin list, and only add the ones really there:
But in both cases, there is still
PD3
. And looks like it is even working: callingread
+toggle
+read
toggles the value.Soo, is there a way to get rid of
PD3
?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions