You are reading a single comment by @ceremcem and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
Smalltalk was in my TODO list (my list of languages to be learned) along with Elixir, Lua and Lisp =)
Our learning survey is mainly motivated by our commercial applications' needs (we learn whatever we need to, or invent sometimes). For example I was forced to learn Python in order to program a Telit 863-PY GSM module, then I liked it very much =)
All these languages incorporated (over time for better or worse) some object-orientation.
Objet-Orientation was actually introduced almost 40 years ago: putting the data (state/data structure) and function (behavior/operation/function) together into one definition, to ensure for good that not the wrong operation/function can be applied on the data (invoking a function / call with the wrong data...). Smalltalk is my favorite in that respect, because the first thing in every expression is the object reference that receives a message to do something, followed by a parameter, which is also an object reference. Smalltalk is also (almost the only language) in which classes are first-class objects, and the method new returns an instance of that class.
Smalltalk got also rid of the cluttering parentheses. In general, the code looks much more concise, but still very prosa. Class and method definitions look like this:
Smalltalk uses parenthesis only to enforce precedence.
Regarding Object-Orientation: Take a look at the brilliant approach of using CRC-Cards - Class-Responsibility-Collaboration-Cards - to crack the OO-nut without going technical. It helps to break down a system into very suitable software components without the syntax clutter of a any language, and helps to think in encapsulated, real-world objects rather than a sequence of operations on a pile of data data types.