Better Pedometer - HELP NEEDED!

@user107850 - I managed to get it to compile with this hack:

I dont think you need to worry about rolling over time_t in 1 year of milli seconds for a test harness where the logs are a few hours at most.

$ git diff
diff --git a/src/types.h b/src/types.h
index 6e74ab1..39a972e 100644
--- a/src/types.h
+++ b/src/types.h
@@ -1,11 +1,12 @@
 [#include](http://forum.espruino.com/sea­rch/?q=%23include) <inttypes.h>
+#include <time.h>
 
 // type for the accelerometer samples, this depends on your hardware
 typedef int16_t accel_t;
 
 // type used for time: warning the algorithm is not robust to roll-over of this variable
 // example: a year worth of ms needs 35 bits, 32 bits allows you to store about 50 days of ms
-typedef uint32_t time_t;
+//typedef uint32_t time_t;
 
 // steps count type
 // the size of this depends on what is the maximum number of steps you are willing to show and store
$ 

But when I ran it I didn't match the results you showed in the README file.

$ ./banglejs-algos-tester |grep oxf
steps-controlled, oxford, 0.csv, 0, 0
steps-controlled, oxford, 0_1.csv, 0, 0
steps-controlled, oxford, 0_2.csv, 0, 0
steps-controlled, oxford, 0_3.csv, 0, 0
steps-controlled, oxford, 100.csv, 77, 100
steps-controlled, oxford, 100_1.csv, 79, 100
steps-controlled, oxford, 100_2.csv, 80, 100
steps-controlled, oxford, 100_3.csv, 170, 100
steps-controlled, oxford, 100_4.csv, 268, 100
steps-controlled, oxford, 100_5.csv, 270, 100
steps-controlled, oxford, 100_6.csv, 270, 100
steps-controlled, oxford, 100_7.csv, 270, 100
steps-controlled, oxford, 150.csv, 326, 150
steps-controlled, oxford, 150_1.csv, 345, 150
steps-controlled, oxford, 150_2.csv, 564, 150
steps-controlled, oxford, 150_3.csv, 727, 150
steps-controlled, oxford, 150_4.csv, 914, 150
steps-uncontrolled, oxford, 0_HughB-static.csv, 0, 0
steps-uncontrolled, oxford, 10134.csv, 17314, 10134
steps-uncontrolled, oxford, 3058.csv, 20694, 3058
steps-uncontrolled, oxford, 0_HughB-work-0.csv, 22287, 0
steps-uncontrolled, oxford, 0_HughB-work-66.csv, 24182, 0
steps-uncontrolled, oxford, 0_HughB-drive-29min-0.csv, 26783, 0
steps-uncontrolled, oxford, 0_HughB-drive-36min-0.csv, 29674, 0
steps-uncontrolled, oxford, 0_HughB-drive-a3-b136.csv, 29678, 0
$ 

I noticed that the step count was just incrementing file on file.
So I looked at the reset code and put a reset in after printing the results from a single test.
See diff below.

diff --git a/src/main.c b/src/main.c
index 0dc2d1d..a4838cb 100644
--- a/src/main.c
+++ b/src/main.c
@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ void becnhmarkFolder(char *prefix, char *dirname)
 
                 fclose(pFile);
             }
+           resetStepCounters(); // reset after every run
         }
     }
     closedir(folder);
@@ -89,4 +90,4 @@ int main()
     resetStepCounters();
 
     return 0;
-}
\ No newline at end of file
+}

Now the results look more realistic and the 3058.csv result for the Oxford of 3301 steps EXACTLY matches your results.

$ ./banglejs-algos-tester |grep oxf
steps-controlled, oxford, 0.csv, 0, 0
steps-controlled, oxford, 0_1.csv, 0, 0
steps-controlled, oxford, 0_2.csv, 0, 0
steps-controlled, oxford, 0_3.csv, 0, 0
steps-controlled, oxford, 100.csv, 113, 100
steps-controlled, oxford, 100_1.csv, 101, 100
steps-controlled, oxford, 100_2.csv, 102, 100
steps-controlled, oxford, 100_3.csv, 91, 100
steps-controlled, oxford, 100_4.csv, 77, 100
steps-controlled, oxford, 100_5.csv, 84, 100
steps-controlled, oxford, 100_6.csv, 80, 100
steps-controlled, oxford, 100_7.csv, 80, 100
steps-controlled, oxford, 150.csv, 138, 150
steps-controlled, oxford, 150_1.csv, 150, 150
steps-controlled, oxford, 150_2.csv, 192, 150
steps-controlled, oxford, 150_3.csv, 131, 150
steps-controlled, oxford, 150_4.csv, 151, 150
steps-uncontrolled, oxford, 0_HughB-static.csv, 0, 0
steps-uncontrolled, oxford, 10134.csv, 17314, 10134
steps-uncontrolled, oxford, 3058.csv, 3301, 3058
steps-uncontrolled, oxford, 0_HughB-work-0.csv, 1347, 0
steps-uncontrolled, oxford, 0_HughB-work-66.csv, 1639, 0
steps-uncontrolled, oxford, 0_HughB-drive-29min-0.csv, 2372, 0
steps-uncontrolled, oxford, 0_HughB-drive-36min-0.csv, 2651, 0
steps-uncontrolled, oxford, 0_HughB-drive-a3-b136.csv, 1093, 0

Can you check the 2 changes I have made to the test framework code are correct.

I will do a pull request for the test files.