I agree. In my code widget I have drafted functions marked NEW/NOT TESTED I have done the code for UBX-CFG-PM2(), not been able to test yet. I read the above comment in the datasheet a while back but did not understand what it meant. I now understand that UBX-CFG-PMS is mean't to be a superset for power management. Hovever PMS seems a bit redundant when it sounds like you have to fill in PM2 as well. One of the power management PDFs shows a chart saying you can get 2ms when using a 10s interval period - the holy grail I guess.
Espruino is a JavaScript interpreter for low-power Microcontrollers. This site is both a support community for Espruino and a place to share what you are working on.
I agree. In my code widget I have drafted functions marked NEW/NOT TESTED I have done the code for UBX-CFG-PM2(), not been able to test yet. I read the above comment in the datasheet a while back but did not understand what it meant. I now understand that UBX-CFG-PMS is mean't to be a superset for power management. Hovever PMS seems a bit redundant when it sounds like you have to fill in PM2 as well. One of the power management PDFs shows a chart saying you can get 2ms when using a 10s interval period - the holy grail I guess.