You are reading a single comment by @Gordon and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Thanks - that's really interesting. Did you manage to get any real world performance stats though? It's fine in theory but I'm pretty sure the speed ends up limited by the IO bus speed.

    Since JS code saved to flash is executed from flash, you should see some improvements in actual JS execution speed. I tend to use this mandelbrot code as a speed test:

    function mandelbrot() {
     var tm = getTime();
     var sizex=32,sizey=32;
     for (var y=0;y<sizey;y++) {
      var line="";
      for (var x=0;x<sizex;x++) {
       var Xr=0;
       var Xi=0;
       var Cr=(4.0*x/sizex)-2.0;
       var Ci=(4.0*y/sizey)-2.0;
       var i=0;
       while ((i<16) && ((Xr*Xr+Xi*Xi)<4)) {
        var t=Xr*Xr - Xi*Xi + Cr;
        Xi=2*Xr*Xi+Ci;
        Xr=t;
        i++;
       }
       line += (i&1) ? "*" : " ";
      }
      print(line);
     }
     print(getTime()-tm);
    }
    
    // from RAM
    mandelbrot(); // 7.44 sec
    // save to flash and then read&eval, so it'll end up in flash
    require("Storage").write("mandeltest","(­"+mandelbrot.toString()+")");
    mandelbrot = eval(require("Storage").read("mandeltest­"));
    // execute from flash
    mandelbrot(); // 8.79 sec
    

    If you copy & paste this in the left hand size hopefully you'll see an improvement.

About

Avatar for Gordon @Gordon started