• Hi Gordon,
    many thanks for the support.
    The Nucleo board I'm using for this experiment is a C-03 board (from the discussion you have linked, it seems to be a "last generation" one)
    Here is the result of the same test described in the post you reported.
    The steps are:
    1) press the USER button and start stopwatch measure (60 sec)
    2) press the button again (when about 60 seconds are passed as indicated by the stopwatch)

     _____                 _
    |   __|___ ___ ___ _ _|_|___ ___
    |   __|_ -| . |  _| | | |   | . |
    |_____|___|  _|_| |___|_|_|_|___|
              |_| http://espruino.com
     1v93 Copyright 2016 G.Williams
    Espruino is Open Source. Our work is supported
    only by sales of official boards and donations:
    http://espruino.com/Donate
    >setWatch(function(e) {  console.log(getTime());
    :console.log(e.time - e.lastTime); }, BTN, { repeat:true, edge:'falling', debounce:10});
    =1
    1656.09075108333 // step 1)
    NaN
    1716.41545185714 // step 2)
    60.15261686904
    > 
    

    The difference between the two presses of the USER button is about 60 sec confirming a good accuracy of the internal timer / oscillator of the board.
    Let me know if the test is OK for you .

    Something strange happens when I pass from the device search (which returns the correct sensor serial) to the device selection on the 1-Wire line...
    Do you have any other suggestions?

    Thanks in advance.

    PS: I also have a Nucleo F401RE Board C0-2 (still working), I try to repeat the experiments with the latter (to see if there are differences)

About

Avatar for Blizzard @Blizzard started